Judge Orders Criminal Action Against Trump Appointees

Judge's gavel hitting a sound block.

Federal Judge James Boasberg threatens criminal contempt charges against Trump administration officials over their refusal to halt deportation flights to El Salvador, setting up a monumental clash between the judicial and executive branches.

Key Insights

  • Judge Boasberg found “probable cause” to hold Trump administration officials in criminal contempt for ignoring court orders to stop deportation flights to El Salvador.
  • The administration used the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to justify deporting over 200 Venezuelan migrants accused of gang membership, with El Salvador accepting them for $6 million.
  • The White House plans to appeal the judge’s decision, arguing that the court order had “no lawful basis” and that national security concerns override judicial intervention.
  • Administration officials have until April 23 to comply with the original order or potentially face criminal charges, though the prosecutorial path remains unclear.

Judicial Authority Challenges Deportation Policy

President Trump’s aggressive immigration enforcement actions have collided with judicial oversight as U.S. District Judge James Boasberg initiated criminal contempt proceedings against administration officials. The confrontation stems from the administration’s deportation of over 200 Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador, despite Boasberg’s explicit temporary restraining order and subsequent 14-day halt on such removals. The judge accused officials of “willful disregard” for his orders, stating that the Constitution does not permit government officials to disobey judicial mandates.

The administration justified these deportations by invoking the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, a rarely used law that gives the president broad powers during wartime or national emergency. While the Supreme Court has upheld the President’s authority to use this act for deportations, Judge Boasberg emphasized that this does not excuse ignoring specific court orders prohibiting certain deportation flights. The migrants, allegedly gang members, were sent to El Salvador after that country agreed to accept them in exchange for $6 million in U.S. aid.

White House Defends Executive Action

The administration has forcefully rejected accusations of contempt, with White House Communications Director Steven Cheung announcing plans to “seek immediate appellate relief.” Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt insisted that “the administration did not ‘refuse to comply’ with a court order,” suggesting instead that the judicial directive lacked proper authority. President Trump has personally criticized Judge Boasberg on social media, calling for his impeachment and framing the conflict as necessary for national security.

“The President is 100% committed to ensuring that terrorists and criminal illegal migrants are no longer a threat to Americans and their communities across the country,” said Steven Cheung.

The administration’s stance reflects its broader approach to immigration enforcement and border security, which has been a centerpiece of President Trump’s agenda. After meeting with Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele, Trump expressed interest in sending additional deportation flights to El Salvador. The partnership with El Salvador represents a strategic international approach to handling migrants deemed security threats, though critics argue it circumvents proper asylum processes and due process protections.

Potential Consequences and Next Steps

Judge Boasberg has given the administration until April 23 to either comply with his original order or face possible criminal contempt charges. Legal experts note that contempt cases against high-ranking government officials are exceedingly rare, creating uncertainty about how enforcement would proceed. The Department of Justice typically handles federal prosecutions, creating a potential conflict since it would be asked to prosecute members of the same administration it serves. Alternatively, Boasberg could appoint a private attorney as special prosecutor, though this unusual step would likely face immediate legal challenges.

“In my experience as a lawyer over the last 30 years, even the hint of being held in contempt by a judge is ordinarily enough in order to cause litigants to correct their behavior,” said Mitchell Epner.

The judge’s frustration appeared to heighten after Secretary of State Marco Rubio retweeted a post in which El Salvador’s president mockingly wrote “Oopsie… Too late 😂😂” above a headline about the court’s return order. Boasberg noted this social media exchange while criticizing the administration’s apparent disregard for judicial authority. He emphasized that allowing officials to “freely annul” court orders would make a “solemn mockery of the Constitution itself,” highlighting the fundamental constitutional principles at stake in this confrontation.

Sources:

  1. US judge says he could hold Trump administration in contempt of court
  2. Here’s what happens if Judge Boasberg holds Trump administration in contempt over El Salvador deportations – CBS News
  3. Judge Opens Criminal Contempt Proceedings Against Trump Officials | HuffPost Latest News

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR