Trump’s Latest Judicial Nominees Include Key Positions in Missouri and the Capital

Man gesturing at rally surrounded by supporters

President Trump announces key judicial nominations for Missouri and DC courts, signaling a renewed focus on reshaping the federal judiciary in his second term.

Key Insights

  • Trump has nominated five individuals to fill critical judicial positions, including four for federal district courts in Missouri and one for the Superior Court of DC.
  • The nomination process is proceeding at a slower pace than during Trump’s first term, largely due to fewer judicial vacancies available to fill.
  • Whitney Hermandorfer’s nomination to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit represents a significant appointment for the appellate level.
  • Trump’s judicial strategy continues to focus on restoring law and order, with nominees like former prosecutor Edward Aloysius O’Connell specifically selected to address crime concerns.
  • Senator Josh Hawley has expressed optimism about swift confirmations for the nominees, suggesting strong Senate support for Trump’s judicial picks.

Trump’s Strategic Judicial Appointments Continue

President Trump is moving forward with a new wave of judicial nominations, announcing five key appointments to federal courts. The nominees include Zachary Bluestone, Joshua Divine, Maria Lanahan, and Cristian Stevents for federal district court positions in Missouri, along with Edward Aloysius O’Connell for the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. These selections follow Trump’s nomination last week of Whitney Hermandorfer for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, indicating the administration’s continued commitment to reshaping the federal judiciary despite a slower start compared to his first term.

Among the nominees, Joshua Divine brings notable credentials having clerked for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and previously served as chief counsel to Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri. Edward Aloysius O’Connell, the DC Superior Court nominee, comes with significant prosecutorial experience from the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington. In announcing O’Connell’s nomination, Trump emphasized that the former prosecutor would help address violent crime in the nation’s capital by “restoring the rule of law,” highlighting the law-and-order focus that continues to characterize the administration’s judicial strategy.

A Different Pace for Trump’s Second Term

The current nomination process reflects a marked difference from Trump’s first term, when Neil Gorsuch was already confirmed to the Supreme Court by this point and a federal judge approved by late May. Observers attribute this slower pace primarily to the reduced number of judicial vacancies facing the administration. During Trump’s first term, he successfully filled 226 federal judgeships, including 54 appointments to courts of appeals – a record that dramatically reshaped the federal judiciary. The current nominations suggest a more measured approach necessary due to fewer open positions.

“Judges protect what we value most in society. No matter who you are, where you come from, what you look like, or who you love, we all deserve judges who can be fair and impartial. That’s why protecting our courts needs to be a two-party job. Democrats and Republicans alike owe it to the American people to ensure that the federal courts remain an impartial institution administering ‘equal justice for all,’ not just the wealthy and the powerful,” Sharon McGowan said.

The impact of Trump’s judicial appointments extends far beyond the immediate confirmations. Five of the 12 circuit courts now have over 25% of judges appointed by Trump, with the 8th Circuit seeing the most significant transformation. These appointments represent a lasting legacy that will shape American jurisprudence for decades, as circuit courts often serve as the final arbiters in legal cases, with the Supreme Court hearing only a small percentage of appeals.

Senate Support and Opposition

Senator Josh Hawley has publicly urged the Trump administration to expedite filling judicial vacancies, particularly in his home state of Missouri. With the recent nominations addressing those concerns, Hawley has expressed optimism about prompt confirmations, suggesting strong Republican support in the Senate. During Trump’s previous term, confirming judges proved to be a primary avenue for advancing his agenda, especially after Democrats gained control of the House, and became a priority for Senate leadership.

“it’s not enough for Democrats to simply stop fast-tracking Trump’s judges — we have been calling on them to oppose every one. Trump’s nominees are the most conservative in history, and Republicans have broken every rule, custom and norm possible to steamroll the Senate’s constitutional responsibility. It’s time for Democrats to do everything they can and unite in their opposition,” said Christopher Kang.

Many of Trump’s judicial nominees have historically been affiliated with the Federalist Society, which has grown significantly with a network of 75,000 people. This connection has heavily influenced the conservative reshaping of the judiciary. As these new nominations move forward, left-leaning groups continue to face challenges in opposing the rightward shift, with some advocates calling for unified Democratic opposition to all Trump judicial nominees based on concerns about their conservative jurisprudence.

Sources:

  1. Trump’s Judicial Appointments Were Confirmed At Historic Pace In 2018 : NPR
  2. Trump Gets a Slow Start on Judges After Setting a Record Pace in First Term – The New York Times
  3. Trump Administration Releases List of Key Judicial Nominees