President Trump directs Attorney General Bondi to investigate law firms for “grossly unethical misconduct,” targeting Marc Elias and others involved in what the administration calls weaponized “lawfare” against the government.
Key Insights
- The DOJ has begun a comprehensive review of law firms involved in what the administration deems frivolous litigation, with a particular focus on misconduct over the past eight years.
- Marc Elias and his law firm have been specifically named in the review due to their connection with the controversial Steele dossier.
- Attorneys found to be violating professional conduct rules could face disciplinary action, loss of security clearances, or termination of federal contracts.
- The White House memo cites Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 and the Model Rules of Professional Conduct as standards prohibiting unethical attorney conduct.
Trump Administration Takes Aim at “Lawfare”
President Donald Trump has issued a directive to Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate attorneys and law firms suspected of engaging in what the administration terms “lawfare” – the weaponization of legal processes for political purposes. The presidential memorandum specifically mentions Marc Elias and his firm, Elias Law Group LLP, known for their involvement with the controversial Steele dossier. The Department of Justice has already begun reviewing potential misconduct by law firms over the past eight years, with a particular focus on those bringing what the administration characterizes as frivolous litigation against the federal government.
The White House memorandum emphasizes accountability for lawyers and law firms that violate U.S. laws or attorney conduct rules, particularly when such violations affect national security, public safety, or election integrity. The directive instructs both the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security to prioritize enforcement of regulations governing attorney conduct and discipline, with potential consequences including professional sanctions, revocation of security clearances, and termination of federal contracts for those found to be engaging in unethical practices.
Trump’s DOJ targets law firms over weaponization: ‘Grossly unethical misconduct’ https://t.co/r5KoRmnahS pic.twitter.com/AExHqeK94m
— TheBlaze (@theblaze) March 25, 2025
Legal Standards and Enforcement Mechanisms
The presidential directive specifically references Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, which prohibits attorneys from filing litigation “for improper purpose[s]” or “to harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation.” This rarely used procedural tool allows judges to initiate sanctions proceedings against attorneys who bring frivolous cases. The memorandum also cites Rule 3.1 of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct, which states that lawyers must have a good faith basis in law and fact for legal proceedings they initiate or defend.
“A lawyer shall not bring or defend a proceeding, or assert or controvert an issue therein, unless there is a basis in law and fact for doing so that is not frivolous, which includes a good faith argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law,” says Rule 3.1 of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct.
Attorney General Bondi has been directed to pursue sanctions under Rule 11 to deter what the administration views as abuse of the court process. However, legal experts note there is no clear definition of “frivolous” litigation under Rule 11, raising concerns about its application in politically charged contexts. The DOJ’s review particularly targets lawyers involved in asylum litigation and other claims against the government that the administration perceives as undermining immigration laws and other policies.
Response from the Legal Community
The directive has sparked strong reactions from those targeted by the investigation. Marc Elias, whose law firm was specifically mentioned in the White House memo, has been vocal in his criticism of the administration’s actions. Elias, a Democratic elections lawyer known for his work opposing Republican election law changes, has framed the directive as an attack on attorneys who challenge the administration’s policies.
“President Trump is attempting to dismantle the Constitution and attack the rule of law in his obsessive pursuit of retribution against his political opponents. Today’s White House Memo targets not only me and my law firm, but every attorney and law firm who dares to challenge his assault on the rule of law,” said Marc Elias.
Other legal advocacy groups have expressed similar concerns, suggesting the investigation could potentially chill legitimate legal challenges to government actions. Critics argue that the directive appears to target specifically those who have opposed the administration in court. The Trump administration currently faces over 100 lawsuits related to its government operations overhaul, with many major law firms involved in this litigation. Some firms, however, have already responded to the pressure – notably, Trump rescinded an order against Paul Weiss after the firm committed to providing pro bono services aligned with his initiatives.
Sources:
- Trump’s DOJ targets law firms over weaponization: ‘Grossly unethical misconduct’ | Blaze Media
- Preventing Abuses of the Legal System and the Federal Court – The White House
- Trump Signs Executive Order Targeting New Law Firm, Jenner & Block – The New York Times
- DOJ Launches ‘Immediate Review’ of Law Firms After Trump Memo
