Controversy Surrounds Release of Josephine Virginia Gray, the “Black Widow,” by Biden Administration

Man in suit speaking at a podium.

President Biden’s decision to release Josephine Virginia Gray, the notorious “Black Widow,” has ignited a firestorm of controversy and criticism.

At a Glance

  • Josephine Virginia Gray, known as the “Black Widow,” was released after President Biden commuted her 40-year sentence
  • Gray was convicted in 2002 for insurance fraud related to the deaths of two husbands and a boyfriend
  • Her release contradicts the White House’s claim that Biden only released “non-violent” offenders
  • This decision is part of Biden’s largest single-day act of clemency in modern presidential history
  • Critics argue this undermines the administration’s promise and raises questions about clemency procedures

The Controversial Release of the “Black Widow”

In a move that has sent shockwaves through political and legal circles, President Joe Biden has commuted the sentence of Josephine Virginia Gray, infamously known as the “Black Widow.” Gray, who was serving a 40-year prison sentence for insurance fraud related to the deaths of two husbands and a boyfriend between 1974 and 1996, has been unexpectedly released as part of Biden’s recent clemency actions.

Gray’s case is particularly controversial due to its violent nature. She was convicted in 2002 for collecting $165,000 from insurance settlements following the suspicious deaths of her partners. While she was charged with murder, prosecutors ultimately secured a conviction for insurance fraud under the “slayers rule.” This release seems to contradict the Biden administration’s emphasis on extending clemency primarily to non-violent offenders.

Biden’s Clemency Actions: A Broader Context

Gray’s release is part of a larger clemency initiative by the Biden administration. President Biden has commuted the prison sentences of nearly 1,500 people and pardoned 39 others, marking the largest single-day act of clemency in modern presidential history. The White House has stated that many of these individuals were serving long sentences that would be shorter under current laws, and many had been on home confinement since the COVID-19 pandemic.

“President Biden announced he is commuting the prison sentences for nearly 1,500 people and pardoning 39 others in what the White House described as the largest act of clemency in a single day in modern presidential history.” –NPR

While the administration has emphasized that most of these pardons were for non-violent drug offenses committed in youth, the inclusion of Gray in this group has raised eyebrows and sparked intense debate. Critics argue that her release undermines the credibility of the entire clemency process and the administration’s stated goals.

The “Black Widow” Case: A Closer Look

The details of Gray’s case are chilling. She was implicated in the deaths of her first husband, Norman Stribbling, in 1974, her second husband, Clarence Goode, in 1990, and her boyfriend, Clarence Langley, in 1996. Despite being charged with murder, prosecutors were unable to secure a conviction on those charges. Instead, they successfully pursued an insurance fraud case, leveraging the “slayers rule” which prevents killers from profiting from their victims’ deaths.

“It was the witchcraft, mostly”- Lenron Goode

Gray’s methods were particularly disturbing. She allegedly used intimidation tactics, including threats of voodoo, to control her victims. In 2000, she reportedly admitted to a friend that she had killed her husbands and boyfriend. The release of such a figure has understandably sparked outrage among law enforcement officials and victims’ rights advocates.

Criticism and Controversy

The decision to release Gray has drawn sharp criticism from various quarters. James Trusty, a former federal prosecutor, expressed his frustration, stating, “It pisses me off, as you can imagine.” He further questioned the rationale behind the decision, asking, “What in God’s name created the impetus to help her?”

Critics argue that Gray’s release not only contradicts the administration’s stated focus on non-violent offenders but also raises serious questions about the vetting process for clemency decisions. The case has reignited debates about the extent and limits of presidential pardon power, as well as the potential for its misuse.

The Broader Implications

While the Gray case has dominated headlines, it’s important to note that it is part of a larger discussion about criminal justice reform and the use of presidential clemency powers. Biden has issued more commutations than any recent president at this point in their first term and has granted categorical pardons for marijuana possession and to LGBTQ+ individuals convicted due to their sexual orientation in the military.

However, clemency advocates argue that Biden could do more, particularly regarding the death penalty. There are ongoing calls from activists and lawmakers for further action, including commuting the sentences of those on death row. As the debate continues, the Gray case serves as a lightning rod for discussions about justice, mercy, and the proper use of presidential powers in the criminal justice system.

Sources:

  1. Biden commutes sentences for 1,500 people. Some say he could do a lot more
  2. ‘Black Widow,’ Who Murdered 3 Ex-Lovers, Freed in Biden’s Historic Clemency Spree
  3. Biden’s pardon reflects historic controversy surrounding US presidential power

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR